BEFORE THE COLORADO OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION

 

In the Matter of Changes to the                             )           Cause No. _________

Rules and Regulations Relating                )          

to Local Government Review of                            )           Docket No. _________

Applications for Permit to Drill and                        )

Related Hearing Procedures                                  )

 

 

JOINT APPLICATION OF THE COLORADO OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION AND COLORADO COUNTIES, INC.

________________________________________________________________

 

The Colorado Oil & Gas Association (COGA) and Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI) jointly request the Commission to adopt changes to its rules and regulations relating to local government review of Applications for Permit to Drill (APD’s) and establishing a clear procedure for local governments to obtain “public issues” hearings thereon.

 

Statement of Basis & Purpose

 

The Commission is charged with providing advance notice of drilling to local governments that register for receipt thereof, CRS 34-60-106(14), and to promulgate rules to protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public in the conduct of oil and gas operations.  CRS 34-60-106(11).  Implicit in this notice requirement is providing a meaningful opportunity for a local government to review a proposed drilling project and comment thereon.  Currently, the Commission’s rules allow for a seven-day local review period, with an automatic ten-day extension upon request.  COGA and CCI agree that these review periods should be extended to allow local governments to make referrals among their relevant departments, to participate in the onsite consultation already provided for in Commission rules, and to formulate comments, or to make the decision to request a hearing.

 

COGA and CCI further agree that, should significant issues related to public health, safety and welfare, including the environment, remain unresolved after this review period, local governments should have a guaranteed opportunity to obtain a hearing on such “public issues” by filing an application, with the issuance of the APD to be withheld pending the (expedited) hearing.  This procedure, already prescribed by Commission rule, is currently committed to the discretion of the Director.  Such hearing would be conducted in the same manner as the “public issues” hearing already provided for with respect to certain applications to increase well density (Rule 508).

 

The proposed rule changes and their specific purpose follow, with new language in italics (ellipses indicate current rule language that precedes or follows the changes):

 

Purpose – extend local government (LGD) comment period on APD’s

 

303.d.  Form 2/2A application and copies to local governmental designees.

… Any comments from the local government designee concerning the Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, and Form 2A as filed shall be provided to the Director and to the applicant in writing within seven (7) ten (10) days after the date on which the Permit-to-Drill, Form 2 was sent to the local government designee(s) by the Director.  The Director shall take no action with respect to the Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, prior to the expiration of the seven (7) ten (10) day period, except under the circumstances provided for in Rule 303.j(1) and (2), or when the Director has received notice from the local governmental designee(s) waiving the seven (7) ten (10) day period.  Upon written request to the Director received prior to the expiration of the seven (7) ten (10) day period, the local government designee shall be granted an extension of up to twenty (20) additional days to consider the application.  If, prior to the expiration of the comment period provided herein and after participation in an onsite consultation under Rule 306.a(3), the local governmental designee files an application for hearing on the Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, under Rule 503.b(6), alleging significant impacts on public health, safety and welfare, including the environment, the Director shall withhold the issuance of such permit and the provisions of Rule 303.k shall apply.

 

Purpose – withhold issuance of certain APD’s until hearing

 

303.k.  Withholding Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, approval.  The Director may withhold the issuance of any Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, for any proposed well when, based on information supplied by a surface owner or local governmental designee, or by staff analysis, and where appropriate as confirmed by an onsite inspection, the Director has reasonable cause to believe that a proposed well location raises significant concerns regarding potential significant adverse impacts to public health, safety and welfare, including the environment.  If such request is made by a local governmental designee under Rules 303.d and 503.b(6), such application shall be granted and the Director shall withhold issuance of the Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, unless the local government has been disqualified from making such request under Rule 501.b.  Any hearing granted pursuant to this rule shall be expedited and the matter shall be heard at the next scheduled Commission hearing, and all parties shall be deemed to have waived any notice requirements to the contrary.  In the event ….

 

Purpose – provide for applications for hearing by local governments on certain APD’s

 

503.b(6).  For purposes of seeking a hearing on a Permit-to-Drill, Form 2, under Rules 303.d and 303.k, the relevant local government shall be the applicant, and the hearing shall be conducted in similar fashion as is specified in Rule 508 with respect to a Public Issues Hearing.  It shall be the burden of the local government applicant to bring forward evidence sufficient for the Commission to make the preliminary findings specified in subsection j of Rule 508 at the outset of such hearing.

 

Respectfully submitted this 13th day of December, 2002:

 

 

__________________________                                ____________________________

J. Greg Schnacke, COGA                                          Larry Kallenberger, CCI